Resolve the conflict in A
by adopting one of the following:
(a) redefine p in ontology A, /* not a good solution */ or
(b) Rename p in Gj to, say, p_Gj for j = 1, ??¦, m to reflect their different semantics.
To conform to the unique name assumption. Each p in the schema that has the
same semantics as P_Gj must be renamed to p_Gj.
FOR each group Gj (j = 1, ??¦, m) with 2 or more ontolgoies having property
p_Gj DO
/* An conflict situation exists between ontology A and the ontologies in Gj;*/
/* p_Gj has the same semantics in the ontologies of Gj */
Resolve the conflict in ontology A using the method described in *** and
******.
ENDFOR
ENDIF
ENDFOR
A Bas s for the Semant c Web and E-Bus ness
Copyright ?© 2007, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission
of Idea Group Inc. is prohibited.
We use an example to show how to achieve the automatically and semantically
exchange of information.
Example.10. Figure 14 shows how to process the semantic information in Semantic
Web and e-business applications based on the ontology hierarchy introduced in the
???Building Ontology System??? section.
Pages:
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487